
This is targeted mainly at relative beginners to systematic training. People who may be doing regular aerobic base, interval, and threshold running, but who haven’t yet tried hill training in any form. For them, I highlight some fairly structured hill training concepts, and then also note that this kind of structure, while helpful for some who prefer a structured program, is not an absolute necessity. Unstructured high-intensity hill running may be just as effective, and combining structured workouts with unstructured workouts might even be the best approach for some.
read more…
Posts From ‘Cardio-Running’ Category
Looking for speed? Maybe hills can help…
VO2 Max: It’s not everything, but it’s very important
I recently added a post to my my other blog regarding VO2 Max, which attempts to describe what it is in a way that will be accessible to lay persons, and also attempts to describe how a person can set about improving their VO2 Max, and attempts to place VO2 Max in perspective as an indicator of aerobic condition for individual athletes, that is of limited use in comparing among athletes. I’ve excerpted the entire post below, because of it’s general relevance in fitness.
What is VO2 Max?
VO2 Max is a measure of the amount of oxygen a person (or animal) consumes when exercising at their maximum rate during a sustained exercise activity. It is expressed in units of mililiters of O2 per minute per kilogram of body mass (i.e., weight), or L/min x kg. If you take body weight out of the equation, it’s just the total volume of oxygen used per minute, but the number has less utility in assessing fitness, because in addition to fitness, body mass itself has an impact on overall oxygen use. This is why VO2 Max is corrected or normalized to body mass by dividing L 02/min by weight in kg.
It is true that there are other factors related to athletic performance that prevent VO2 Max from being a very good way to compare different athletes for the purpose of predicting performance, as is frequently pointed out by exercises scientists and the more coaches and trainers with a background in physiology. Because all else is not equal among runners, a strong runner or one with a high lactate threshold and a VO2 Max of 50 can on any given day beat a weaker runner or one with a low lactate threshold and a VO2 Max of 60. Indeed, lactate threshold pace is a better predictor of finish order in a group of athletes in a race.
This is not to say, however that VO2 Max is unimportant on an individual basis for predicting performance and assessing changes in fitness and condition for individual athletes. This is because, if you are not comparing one runner to another, but instead comparing VO2 Max in a single runner at two different points in time (say, before and after a period of intense training), VO2 Max is a very good predictor of performance. So, the lesson here is that VO2 Max is important in determining performance of endurance athletes, but it not useful for comparing athletes one to another.
Improving VO2 Max
Through training
The straightforward answer is that an optimal combination of aerobic running and interval training at a pace a few seconds faster, or at higher intensity, than 5K pace will do the trick. Assuming that the runner’s weight doesn’t change during the training period, changes that result from this type of training can be directly attributed to improvements in muscular strength and running economy. Underlying these changes may be increase vascularization in the muscle tissues, and an increase in the metabolic machinery in muscle cells that are responsible for conversion of fuel (carbohydrates and fats) to energy.
Through weight management
The second way to improve VO2 Max is only important for people who are above their optimum race weight. Recall that body mass (weight) is in the denominator of the units that VO2 Max are expressed in, and in Junior High School (though the information doesn’t stick if you don’t use it later–I’m a geek, so I use it!), it that if you decrease the value of the denominator (the bottom number) in a fraction, the entire fraction becomes a larger quantity. So, for people who are carrying extra weight who want to improve both their speed and endurance, losing weight can be far highly effective.
It works like this: Let’s say a person uses a total of 3600 ml of O2 per minute during maximal running exercise. This is determined largely by their physiology, so doesn’t change much, even as their weight moves up and down a few pounds. It’s the amount of oxygen used to do a particular amount of work (in the physics sense), although you don’t need to deal in physics jargon to understand that if you wear an extra 10 lbs. around your waist, you’re not going to be able to run as fast as you otherwise would–and that’s the important point here.
Now, let’s examine this a little more closely. Let’s say this same person weight 72 kg. (about 160 lbs.). Our VO2 Max is calculated as follows:
VO2 Max = 3600 ml O2 / 1 min. * 72 kg. = 50 ml/min*kg
Now, Let’s say the person reduces their caloric intake a modest amount for a month, and trains only enough to maintain their condition, losing 5 kg.. In that case, their VO2 Max still improves:
VO2 Max = 3600 ml O2 / 1 min. * 67 kg. = 53 ml/min*kg
So, Just from losing weight, we see this person’s VO2 Max (and thus their ability to move their body mass further in a given amount of time by running) has improved. Further, since they were on a maintenance workout plan, all of the improvement can be attributed simply to weight loss. Further, weight fluctuates 2-4 lbs. during the day for a variety of reasons, which means that VO2 Max actually fluctuates as well, changing by around 1 unit. This might explain why some people feel like their training goes better early in the day. They may not being carrying the extra baggage of several daily meals and snacks and accompanying excess water weight early in the morning.
What’s that? You don’t believe a 2-4 lb. fluctuation can have much of a noticeable effect on your running performance? Consider this: Researchers have actually measured the effect and found that running pace changes in proportion to our body weight, almost perfectly. So, if I weight 160 lbs. and I gain 4 lbs. with no change in my strength and condition, I can expect my average training paces to decrease by 2.5% (4/160 = 0.025 = 2.5%). Thus, if my 5K pace is 7:30 to start with, losing 4 lbs. will improve my my 5K pace to about 7:18-7:19. In a 5K (3.1 mi.) race, that’s a 33-36 second improvement!
Anyone seeking to improve their performance by losing weight should be careful, however. There are risks.
Know your limits
Of course, not everyone can afford to lose any more weight (there is such a thing as being underweight). If a person is already underweight, muscle tissue begins to be consumed by the body and performance can be adversely affected. So, there is a point of diminishing returns when it comes to weight loss, and each person has an optimum race weight based on their frame, bone structure, muscle mass, muscle types, and other genetically influenced aspects of physiology.
Though imperfect, body mass index (BMI) is a decent way to determine if you can afford to lose some weight to improve your VO2 Max and running performance. Most people can safely shoot for a BMI that approaches the low end of the “normal” range for BMI. Elite endurance athletes are often below this, but the average person may not have the knowledge, experience, or resources available to maintain such a low BMI and remain fully fit and healthy.
The moral of this story is that if you train right, and if you optimize your body weight, you can achieve significant gains in performance, but you should also be aware of and comfortable with your limits. The truth is that we are all probably capable of performing much better than we ever thought possible, if we can master this stuff, but many of us don’t really have that level of ambition–and that’s ok. It’s still possible for those people to use these tactics to help reach whatever goals they set for themselves.
Other considerations
Improving VO2 Max can really improve individual performance, but once the optimum weight is reached, there are other tactics that, if previously neglected, can be more effective for further improving performance. They include strength training, and threshold or tempo training to improve lactate threshold. I’ve talked about these things in other posts and will likely post about them more in the future. The primary methods for improving strength for runners include a variety of hill training body weight exercises, and weights. Lactate threshold, or the pace/intensity at which lactate begins to build up in the muscles and blood, hindering performance and ultimately forcing us to slow or stop entirely, is best improved through threshold or tempo training–essentially running slightly higher than lactate threshold pace/intensity in 3-5 minute intervals (tempo intervals), or for longer sustained periods right at lactate threshold.
Serious athletes use all of the above training methods to improve and optimize their running performance.
Active recovery: all the cool kids are doing it
Recovery after a hard or very long workout during which muscles fibers suffer the microtears the stimulate the bodies healing process to strengthen the tissue, is important. If an athlete is very sore, some people believe it’s better if they rest entirely until the soreness has abated, and this makes good sense, because the degree of soreness may be related to the amount of microtearing that has occurred during a hard workout. If the soreness is miles, an athlete may instead choose to do what is called “active” recovery, which is they may choose to do a very easy run instead of resting completely on an off day. read more…
“Runner’s knee” or patellofemoral pain
Many runners, jumpers, and other athletes develop pain behind/around one or both patellas (knee caps) at some point. Although the exact cause of the pain is not known for certain, there is a prevailing theory about what causes it, and that theory has led to some treatments that seem effective, and some changes in running form (biomechanics) that seem also to help. I have suffered from patellofemoral pain several times as an adult. The pain for me was each time coincident with increases in volume of hiking, running, or jumping activities without any obvious sudden event to mark it’s onset. It simply comes on slowly and over time gets worse if I don’t get a handle on it. read more…
Picking shoes based on foot type assessment not effective
Excerpted from FoCo Runner Blog (originally published 7/21/2010)
If you have read some of my earlier posts on the subjects of biomechanics, feet, or shoes, you know that I suggest people pick out shoes that are -LESS- stabilizing than those recommended at running shoes and most experts based on visual assessments, and even gait analyses. Recent research indicating that certain types of common running injuries increase with increasingly supportive shoes (e.g., see here) are what drives this recommendation, but it is also supported by a recent study done by the Army. read more…
Overpronation: is it up to you, or up to the shoe?
Excerpted from FoCo Runner Blog (originally published 6/25/2010)
When I started running, my left foot seemed to overpronate a little, such that the recommendation of the running store experts was “mild stability shoes.”
“Okay,” I said. “Show me your mild stability shoes and I’ll pick some out and be on my way.”
Since I wanted lightweight trainers, I ended up in Asics Gel DS Trainers. Nice lightweight shoes, really, but soon I developed ITBS, and then the outsoles wore through to the midsole of the Trainers in less than 300 miles, and I was looking for other options.
read more…
Biomechanics note: gait retraining effective in patellofemoral syndrome
Patellofemoral syndrome causes pain at the behind or around the kneecap that can be aggravated by running. It’s cause is unknown, but it is correlated with certain problematic features of running gait, such as amount of hip adduction and inward rotation of the knee during stance phase, and what is called “contralateral pelvic drop,” which essentially refers to the the amount the hip opposite the load bearing hip drops when the load bearing hip is under load. These same features correlate to other pain/overuse syndromes in runners as well, such as iliotibial band syndrome, and also contribute to overpronation of the foot.
The link below is to the abstract (short summary) of an article published in the British Journal of Sports Medicine which demonstrates that learned changes in gait to reduce the severity of the problematic features of running gait is associated with reduction and pain and improvements in function of the knee of people affected by patellofemoral syndrome. An additional benefit fo the retraining was a noted 18% reduction in the instantaneous and 20% reduction in average load rates at the knee. Load rate is the speed at which a load is presented to the the knee, in this case – or a measure of impact force transmitted to the knee due to the foot striking the ground under load.
The results support the assertion by many that learned improvements in biomechanics of the hips, where many of the problems that underlie patellofemoral and other pain or overuse syndromes experienced by runners, not only result in reduced patellofemoral pain, but also in improved function (shock absorption) along the entire kinetic chain involved in running gait.
I can provide the link to the publication’s abstract here, but in order to see the full article, you will likely need to visit a University library or purchase a full-text version from the publisher (sorry).
The effect of real-time gait retraining on hip kin… [Br J Sports Med. 2010] – PubMed result.
