
This is targeted mainly at relative beginners to systematic training. People who may be doing regular aerobic base, interval, and threshold running, but who haven’t yet tried hill training in any form. For them, I highlight some fairly structured hill training concepts, and then also note that this kind of structure, while helpful for some who prefer a structured program, is not an absolute necessity. Unstructured high-intensity hill running may be just as effective, and combining structured workouts with unstructured workouts might even be the best approach for some.
read more…
Posts From ‘Training Methods’ Category
Looking for speed? Maybe hills can help…
VO2 Max: It’s not everything, but it’s very important
I recently added a post to my my other blog regarding VO2 Max, which attempts to describe what it is in a way that will be accessible to lay persons, and also attempts to describe how a person can set about improving their VO2 Max, and attempts to place VO2 Max in perspective as an indicator of aerobic condition for individual athletes, that is of limited use in comparing among athletes. I’ve excerpted the entire post below, because of it’s general relevance in fitness.
What is VO2 Max?
VO2 Max is a measure of the amount of oxygen a person (or animal) consumes when exercising at their maximum rate during a sustained exercise activity. It is expressed in units of mililiters of O2 per minute per kilogram of body mass (i.e., weight), or L/min x kg. If you take body weight out of the equation, it’s just the total volume of oxygen used per minute, but the number has less utility in assessing fitness, because in addition to fitness, body mass itself has an impact on overall oxygen use. This is why VO2 Max is corrected or normalized to body mass by dividing L 02/min by weight in kg.
It is true that there are other factors related to athletic performance that prevent VO2 Max from being a very good way to compare different athletes for the purpose of predicting performance, as is frequently pointed out by exercises scientists and the more coaches and trainers with a background in physiology. Because all else is not equal among runners, a strong runner or one with a high lactate threshold and a VO2 Max of 50 can on any given day beat a weaker runner or one with a low lactate threshold and a VO2 Max of 60. Indeed, lactate threshold pace is a better predictor of finish order in a group of athletes in a race.
This is not to say, however that VO2 Max is unimportant on an individual basis for predicting performance and assessing changes in fitness and condition for individual athletes. This is because, if you are not comparing one runner to another, but instead comparing VO2 Max in a single runner at two different points in time (say, before and after a period of intense training), VO2 Max is a very good predictor of performance. So, the lesson here is that VO2 Max is important in determining performance of endurance athletes, but it not useful for comparing athletes one to another.
Improving VO2 Max
Through training
The straightforward answer is that an optimal combination of aerobic running and interval training at a pace a few seconds faster, or at higher intensity, than 5K pace will do the trick. Assuming that the runner’s weight doesn’t change during the training period, changes that result from this type of training can be directly attributed to improvements in muscular strength and running economy. Underlying these changes may be increase vascularization in the muscle tissues, and an increase in the metabolic machinery in muscle cells that are responsible for conversion of fuel (carbohydrates and fats) to energy.
Through weight management
The second way to improve VO2 Max is only important for people who are above their optimum race weight. Recall that body mass (weight) is in the denominator of the units that VO2 Max are expressed in, and in Junior High School (though the information doesn’t stick if you don’t use it later–I’m a geek, so I use it!), it that if you decrease the value of the denominator (the bottom number) in a fraction, the entire fraction becomes a larger quantity. So, for people who are carrying extra weight who want to improve both their speed and endurance, losing weight can be far highly effective.
It works like this: Let’s say a person uses a total of 3600 ml of O2 per minute during maximal running exercise. This is determined largely by their physiology, so doesn’t change much, even as their weight moves up and down a few pounds. It’s the amount of oxygen used to do a particular amount of work (in the physics sense), although you don’t need to deal in physics jargon to understand that if you wear an extra 10 lbs. around your waist, you’re not going to be able to run as fast as you otherwise would–and that’s the important point here.
Now, let’s examine this a little more closely. Let’s say this same person weight 72 kg. (about 160 lbs.). Our VO2 Max is calculated as follows:
VO2 Max = 3600 ml O2 / 1 min. * 72 kg. = 50 ml/min*kg
Now, Let’s say the person reduces their caloric intake a modest amount for a month, and trains only enough to maintain their condition, losing 5 kg.. In that case, their VO2 Max still improves:
VO2 Max = 3600 ml O2 / 1 min. * 67 kg. = 53 ml/min*kg
So, Just from losing weight, we see this person’s VO2 Max (and thus their ability to move their body mass further in a given amount of time by running) has improved. Further, since they were on a maintenance workout plan, all of the improvement can be attributed simply to weight loss. Further, weight fluctuates 2-4 lbs. during the day for a variety of reasons, which means that VO2 Max actually fluctuates as well, changing by around 1 unit. This might explain why some people feel like their training goes better early in the day. They may not being carrying the extra baggage of several daily meals and snacks and accompanying excess water weight early in the morning.
What’s that? You don’t believe a 2-4 lb. fluctuation can have much of a noticeable effect on your running performance? Consider this: Researchers have actually measured the effect and found that running pace changes in proportion to our body weight, almost perfectly. So, if I weight 160 lbs. and I gain 4 lbs. with no change in my strength and condition, I can expect my average training paces to decrease by 2.5% (4/160 = 0.025 = 2.5%). Thus, if my 5K pace is 7:30 to start with, losing 4 lbs. will improve my my 5K pace to about 7:18-7:19. In a 5K (3.1 mi.) race, that’s a 33-36 second improvement!
Anyone seeking to improve their performance by losing weight should be careful, however. There are risks.
Know your limits
Of course, not everyone can afford to lose any more weight (there is such a thing as being underweight). If a person is already underweight, muscle tissue begins to be consumed by the body and performance can be adversely affected. So, there is a point of diminishing returns when it comes to weight loss, and each person has an optimum race weight based on their frame, bone structure, muscle mass, muscle types, and other genetically influenced aspects of physiology.
Though imperfect, body mass index (BMI) is a decent way to determine if you can afford to lose some weight to improve your VO2 Max and running performance. Most people can safely shoot for a BMI that approaches the low end of the “normal” range for BMI. Elite endurance athletes are often below this, but the average person may not have the knowledge, experience, or resources available to maintain such a low BMI and remain fully fit and healthy.
The moral of this story is that if you train right, and if you optimize your body weight, you can achieve significant gains in performance, but you should also be aware of and comfortable with your limits. The truth is that we are all probably capable of performing much better than we ever thought possible, if we can master this stuff, but many of us don’t really have that level of ambition–and that’s ok. It’s still possible for those people to use these tactics to help reach whatever goals they set for themselves.
Other considerations
Improving VO2 Max can really improve individual performance, but once the optimum weight is reached, there are other tactics that, if previously neglected, can be more effective for further improving performance. They include strength training, and threshold or tempo training to improve lactate threshold. I’ve talked about these things in other posts and will likely post about them more in the future. The primary methods for improving strength for runners include a variety of hill training body weight exercises, and weights. Lactate threshold, or the pace/intensity at which lactate begins to build up in the muscles and blood, hindering performance and ultimately forcing us to slow or stop entirely, is best improved through threshold or tempo training–essentially running slightly higher than lactate threshold pace/intensity in 3-5 minute intervals (tempo intervals), or for longer sustained periods right at lactate threshold.
Serious athletes use all of the above training methods to improve and optimize their running performance.
Active recovery: all the cool kids are doing it
Recovery after a hard or very long workout during which muscles fibers suffer the microtears the stimulate the bodies healing process to strengthen the tissue, is important. If an athlete is very sore, some people believe it’s better if they rest entirely until the soreness has abated, and this makes good sense, because the degree of soreness may be related to the amount of microtearing that has occurred during a hard workout. If the soreness is miles, an athlete may instead choose to do what is called “active” recovery, which is they may choose to do a very easy run instead of resting completely on an off day. read more…
Revising and refining your heart rate training zones
Earlier, I posted a primer on heart rate training that included a description of heart rate zones that are determined as percent ranges of estimated maximum heart rate. This is the simplest way to delineate heart rates zones, but many people find that these zones don’t quite mesh well with perceived effort. For example, jogging at their easiest possible pace may put them in Zone 2 based on this system, when such low intensity is supposed to correspond to Zone 1. Here I’ll give a couple of reasons for this, and offer a couple of alternative means of calculating heart rate zones that prove to be a better for many people facing this problem. read more…
Aerobic and anaerobic intensity and interval training
Or… Should I walk or run between intervals and why?
Although heart rate is a decent overall indicator of our level of physical exertion or exercise intensity, it’s not perfect. Exercises that require a larger proportion of our skeletal muscles will yield a higher cardiac response than those that require less. I can work my pinky finger aerobically and have it barely register in my heart rate at all. That is, unless I perhaps I have done some form of maximal exercise testing for pinky flexing so I can put what small cardiac response there is in proper perspective. My general point is that over time we have come to view metabolism as a whole body thing, as if there is some power plant somewhere in the body that sends energy out to the muscles and organs, but the reality is that “metabolism” refers to a process that happens in each cell.
ChiRunning: Week something or other
Ok, I’ve been practicing ChiRunning for weeks now, as part of an overall strategy to come back from ITBS. The comeback overall has been spectacular, and I believe I can credit improved biomechanics from ChiRunning practice for some of what I’ve been able to achieve. I have my form down pretty well, although I continue to check it throughout my runs (it’s become a sort of meditative running habit). My average pace has come down from before my ITBS by about a minute per mile, and I have has many runs over 10 miles, and as long as 16 miles without any difficulties with my ITBS, and afterward I have generally felt pretty good, particularly after a couple of hours of relaxing.
There are no longer any aspects of my stride or biomechanics that feel like a strain or that feel stressful on any joints or tendons. My only frustration has been that when I started biking, I seem to have worn my cycling shoes too tight a couple of times and impinged a nerve on top of my foot that has caused some discomfort with pressure from any kind of shoe when walking or running at times.
I began ChiRunning practice because it the biomechanics of it make sense to me as a means of reducing injury risk. It focuses most of the effort of running on the strongest muscles groups, and reduces the typical effort/strain a typical heel-striking runner places on the ankle and knees. It uses what we have as humans, to our advantage.
So, I can say at this stage that I am happy that I made an effort to learn ChiRunning form and practiced it diligently. It has become automatic now, and has improved my running markedly. I would recommend it to people struggling to overcome repeated or chronic injuries in the lower extremities from running. It promises to treat what could be the underlying cause of these kind of problems (errors in biomechanics), rather than just providing serial relief from symptoms.
The only caveat is that if you try ChiRunning, I think it should be accompanied by a good core exercise program and exercises to strengthen the hip musculature, and particular the glutes (medius and maximums) and hips. These are needed, particularly if you suffer from ITB, to maintain your hip stability and posture. Getting or keeping them conditioned and strong could really help you get your lost miles back.
Heart Rate Training in a Nutshell
Heart rate is a useful indicator of fitness (resting heart rate), and work intensity during aerobic/cardio workouts, but it can be difficult to find and maintain a sense of your pulse manually when resting, and doing so during workouts can be difficult because you may be distracted by what you are doing or because taking your pulse may take your focus off your exercise. That’s why some runners actually walk for a short distance while they take their pulse manually, while bicyclists either stop or coast with only one hand on the bars.
The solution is a heart rate monitor. The most reliable ones are those that sense the heart rate through a chest strap. I have been using one to track my workouts for some time, and I recommend them. Whether you’re really trying to get into optimal condition for some reason, or just trying to get in better shape than you are, a heart rate monitor can be like a coach, providing instantaneous (right now) feedback on your exercise intensity that can tell you when you need to ramp it down a bit or when you need to get your butt in gear. There is an adage I’ve heard in the fitness field that says “people tend to work too hard on their easy days and too easy on their hard days.” I didn’t realize how true this was until I started using a heart rate monitor, and from personal experience I can say that a heart rate monitor can help you remedy this, so you can achieve your fitness goals more efficiently and avoid overtraining. read more…
